In REGENTS OF THE UNIV. OF CAL. V. USDHS the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decided:
“With due respect for the Executive Branch, we disagree. The government may not simultaneously both assert that its actions are legally compelled, based on its interpretation of the law, and avoid review of that assertion by the judicial branch, whose “province and duty” it is “to say what the law is.” Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137, 177 (1803). The government’s decision to rescind DACA is subject to judicial review. And, upon review, we conclude that plaintiffs are likely to succeed on their claim that the rescission of DACA—at least as justified on this record—is arbitrary, capricious, or otherwise not in accordance with law. We therefore affirm the district court’s grant of preliminary injunctive relief.”
See? There is intelligent life in USA and Trump doesn’t get his way, again.
See the whole opinion in REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA v United States Department of Homeland Security
Of course, this is not over yet but Sessions, Nielsen and Trump are just wrong so many ways in everything they say and do about immigration. They should just pack their bags and go away.