Trump Creates Second-Class Citizens

“The Department of Homeland Security is proposing to expand the files it collects on immigrants, as well as some citizens, by including more online data—most notably search results and social media information—about each individual.”
See U.S. to Collect Social Media Data of Immigrants
USA is a country of many immigrants. Trump has a plan to sort them all out. Immigrants after some date will now be stripped of the right to be free of unreasonable search. Yes, USA will be great after they do that. It’s interesting that the constitution of USA will be side-stepped again by regulation rather than modifying the constitution. Didn’t Trump campaign against that? How soon power has corrupted his feigned respect for human beings.

About Robert Pogson

I am a retired teacher in Canada. I taught in the subject areas where I have worked for almost forty years: maths, physics, chemistry and computers. I love hunting, fishing, picking berries and mushrooms, too.
This entry was posted in politics, technology and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Trump Creates Second-Class Citizens

  1. oiaohm says:
    ISIS is a militant group that follows doctrine of Sunni Islam. Sunni Muslims constituted 87–90% of the world’s Muslim population Robert.

    Grece apparently to you the USA is the world. The biggest Muslim group globally is Shia with only 30 percent. Sunni is smaller than that at around 25% globally. Yes that leaves about 45 percent that don’t own to belong to either of the Muslim disputing groups in the camp of moderates.

    Muslim numbers have high concentrations of one sect or another in areas. So some areas are 90+ shia controlled others are 90+ Sunni controlled. Controlled as they are the ones who run the mosques but the following of that faith is a different matter.

    Yes the dominances of Sunni in the USA can be a problem. Yes its normally the ones that control the mosques who get media coverage. Yes the USA rules do say freedom of religion yet where in the USA would Shia and Moderates be able to pray what is mostly no where in the USA. Please note Australia is the other way over where most of the mosques are Shia the Shia do tolerate those that don’t 100 percent believe what they do properly. And due to most of the mosques being Shia we do have media stories talking against terrorism from Clerics and that the communities should be doing everything to help the police stamp it out.

  2. Grece wrote, “He had a ISIS flag in the cab of the U-Haul. ISIS is a militant group that follows doctrine of Sunni Islam.”

    The Murdering Bastards™ are not a religious group. They are a cult of death. They should no more be called muslims than Al Capone should have been called Catholic. Catholics believe in the commandment, “Thou shalt not kill.”, same as muslims. The Murdering Bastards™ abuse the Quran and Islam. It’s disgusting to all humanity.

  3. Grece says:

    Not religious you say?

    He had a ISIS flag in the cab of the U-Haul. ISIS is a militant group that follows doctrine of Sunni Islam. Sunni Muslims constituted 87–90% of the world’s Muslim population Robert.

    How many Muslims do you see condemning this attack?

  4. Grece wrote, “Trudeau encourages animals of the religion of peace.”

    There’s no evidence that Trudeau encouraged this would-be murderer nor that the bastard was the least bit religious. Grece is making up stories to fit Grece’s world-view.

    UPDATE I just watched a conference by Edmonton Police and RCMP. The bastard was a Somali refugee assessed as not a threat two years ago. Sadly, video shows citizens did little to assist the injured police officer this bastard tried to kill. If I were there I would have done my best to kick the 4!!#@! out of the bastard. Police eventually rammed the U-Haul truck before it could injure more people. I was also surprised to learn neither the officer originally attacked nor the arresting officers used their pistols on the bastard. It would have been appropriate. However now they have his living carcass to interrogate.

  5. An Out Of Phase Transistor says:

    Why would it be illegal to impose any rules to allow people in your country?

    Because everything is “illegal, immoral, and totally horrible” if Trump does it, in the eyes of the liberal media apparatus; when Obama did it, they remained completely silent.

    Curius isn’t it? Even more curious that our dear Robert fails to notice any discrepancy, guess Canadian media either suck or brainwash really well.

    If one wishes to immigrate, one must obey.

    A bit brutal statement, eh? Wouldn’t it be more prudent to say that people should “do, as Romans do,” if they stay in Rome, that is.

    But then who stays in Rome nowadays, and where is the bloody place…

  6. Grece says:

    USA is a country of many American citizens Robert. Your comment albeit being incorrect, would be analogous to stating the Canada is a country of many Eskimo’s.

  7. oiaohm says:

    Deaf Spy there is issues with bypassing these rules over unreasonable search.

    Please note the rules are not long for long term immigration. Its for people who are just visiting as well.

    The big question is who is has to pay the cost if those passwords leak. USA boarder rules really make 2 factor authentication more critical because passwords will be out in the open. Also this is very big security theater. And I do mean security theater as if I charter a private jet to the USA boarder security does not bother searching stuff. So hostile immigrants just need more money.

    Its like a lot of airports around the world huge amount of inspections on people getting on the aircraft next to none on the people loading the luggage who are getting up point blank on the aircraft.

  8. Deaf Spy says:

    Why would it be illegal to impose any rules to allow people in your country? You country = your rules. If one wishes to immigrate, one must obey.

Leave a Reply