No Matter How Charged With Punishment The Scroll… *

“The Republican Party has actually nominated for president an irresponsible, unrealistic, naive, petulant, childish, vindictive, prejudiced, bigoted, racist, Islamophobic, anti-Semitic, misogynistic, fascistic, authoritarian, insensitive, erratic, disturbed, irrational, inhuman individual named Donald John Trump.
 
This…is madness.”
 
See 176 Reasons Donald Trump Shouldn’t Be President
TFA quoted on the right itemizes 176 reasons Trump should not become POTUS. You’d think a few would be enough, but no, USAians being polled are split four ways and it’s about even in the popular vote Trump v Clinton. This is madness. Let’s hope USA learns from the exercise and never does this again for a long time. While Clinton is far from perfect, her list of errors can be counted on one hand and stem from trying to be a public servant for decades. Meanwhile Trump was womanizing, bullying, bankrupting, and boasting about it all the time. Her foundation has saved millions of lives. His has paid out bribes and merely puffed up his ego. Trump has accounted for almost nothing of his accomplishments while Clinton’s are very public. What’s he hiding in his taxes? If Clinton had a conflict of interest connecting to a charity and US Dept. of State, how much larger will be the conflict when Trump’s empire of hundreds of businesses is run by family members? Every decision he makes will affect those businesses. Think he might lean to help them out? It’s a matter of scale. Clinton may have had $thousands of reasons to do something, Trump has $billions… Just do the maths.

* This title comes from Invictus, a poem about a proud person doing the right thing without regard to consequences. The poem is about noble causes and good things. Trump is just plain evil. The few times he’s said anything positive/uplifting in this campaign, it has been smoke and mirrors, not substance. His scroll is charged with way more than 176 egregious crimes. TFA’s list is just the beginning. Trump promises to do a lot immediately when he takes office. It would be a quick trip into tyranny and corruption.

About Robert Pogson

I am a retired teacher in Canada. I taught in the subject areas where I have worked for almost forty years: maths, physics, chemistry and computers. I love hunting, fishing, picking berries and mushrooms, too.
This entry was posted in politics and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

16 Responses to No Matter How Charged With Punishment The Scroll… *

  1. oiaohm says:

    The UN study followed people applications to migrate.
    http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/publications/others/docs/World_Migration_Figures_UNDESA_OECD.pdf
    Rather dated, but still reinforces what I previously stated, unlike you.
    I see Ham-Dong quoting a bias bit of garbage.

    USA accepts a lot more than everywhere else. USA majority of USA immigration is coming by Mexico between natives and others deeper in the Americas.

    Really number migrating to a country does not say how popular you are. I wish I could find the UN survey they asked a good question is that country final country where you wish to be. With the USA the answer as most no with the answer being Canada.

    So what happens here you get refuges who want to get to Canada who get into the USA then not get to be able to go to Canada.

    Out of all the countries around the world the USA is the easiest to get into. Even better if you have committed genocide its one of the most likely countries where you will not be punished for that.

    Northern America numbers of migration is also a another key clue. Amount of migration to Northern America has dropped. Yes for some reason USA migration numbers have increased. Guess what Canada restricted who they would take so triggering the migration numbers to drop by quite a percentage. Result was over all migration numbers drop and USA got stuck with more rejects so appears to be more popular than it really is.

    So what the idiot is saying is like saying when there is a huge que on the street for a particular item that the item is not popular but the foot path they are standing on. USA is a footpath.

    The other issue is addressing the drug wars in Mexico to make the place safe and stable would go a long way to making USA immigration numbers more sane.

    USA was a more respectable place in the era after the last great war; less government and more freedoms.
    LOL Rose colour glasses. The history says you have more freedom now from government regulation than just after world war II. Cases had to be fought to get back free right to speak in the USA after the end of world war II.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_history_of_the_United_States#Postwar_prosperity:_1945.E2.80.931973
    The real story is at the end of world war II in the usa 200 billion dollars of free cash from the government war bonds was dumped into the place. Add on left overs from war the economy went through the roof. The USA is basically bankrupt these days so cannot do that stunt again. Some of the way USA hunts out wars to fight is to attempt to re-trigger that golden age.

    Something to be very aware of banning all Muslim immigration at best would only reduce USA numbers by 10 percent. Majority of USA immigration is Christian. The largest business in the USA is in fact for making Christian religions materials.

    With Christian history no Muslims to complain about ends up with Christian vs Christian warfare.

  2. dougman says:

    “Trump wants to go back to those Good Old Days…”

    USA was a more respectable place in the era after the last great war; less government and more freedoms.

  3. oiaohm wrote, “This is some of the problem the USA people think they are way more popular than they really are.
     
    Its about time you stop believing myths. Yes the USA was a more population destination after world war II when it was kind impossible for people to find out how badly the place is stuffed up.”

    Apart from prohibition and segregation and the mafia, USA wasn’t as badly messed up as it is today. OTOH, Trump wants to go back to those Good Old Days…

  4. dougman says:

    Ham-Dong, instead of quoting Wikipedia, which has spurious information at best. You could attempt to use more relevant information to back yourself up with.

    See, here is is MY relevant information: http://www.gallup.com/poll/153992/150-Million-Adults-Worldwide-Migrate.aspx

    Rather dated, but still reinforces what I previously stated, unlike you.

  5. oiaohm says:

    If America was such a “disaster mess”, why does everyone want to come here?
    LOLOL not researched comment as normal.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_refugee_population

    If I could find the UN Study that puts USA outside the top 100 countries preferred by refugees. Canada and Australia is way ahead of the USA in a population location for people to go willingly. USA is fairly much where they go when no one else is accepting them. Basically hope you like Australian and Canada and other countries rejected refugees as that is mostly what the USA gets. So most of the USA refugees are from other countries reject bins normal after they have been rejected from at least 6 countries before they put in request to go to the USA.

    Yes I understand why USA might be having some issues with refugees causing major problems. Part of it is because you are not popular country so most of the refugees you get is from the bottom of the barrel.

    Sad reality says if a refugee is putting USA as first choice be suspect they are up to no good. Due to the reality how unpopular the USA is.

    Mostly because it does not take much research to work out how much of a “disaster mess” the USA is. A person wanting to get away from a war zone does not want to go to a country where war like behaviour is normal in the streets.

    This is some of the problem the USA people think they are way more popular than they really are.

    Its about time you stop believing myths. Yes the USA was a more population destination after world war II when it was kind impossible for people to find out how badly the place is stuffed up.

  6. dougman says:

    “dougman I would say focus on cleaning up your own disaster mess of a country before pointing at others.”

    If America was such a “disaster mess”, why does everyone want to come here?

  7. oiaohm says:

    So you condone, miscreant’s illegally migrating to a country, propagating like mice and demanding laws to be changed to suit their ways. Followed with consolidation of power while shoving their theocracy down everyone’s throat.
    Look at a USA money note or coin.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_God_We_Trust

    That right exactly what the USA allowed happen is pushing Christian/Muslim/Jewish theocracy down everyone’s throat. I bet dougman complete missed that this has happened. Does In God We Trust properly refer to non Christian/Muslim/Jewish the answer is no it does not.

    Something about being in Australia that pissed me off is going to a Christian school and find them teaching
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advance_Australia_Fair
    With 3 verses instead of two. Just so they could include praise to god. Do not underestimate how much Christian groups will attempt to draw countries into keep on fighting the crusades.

    Oh, and if you do not agree then they murder you in the most egregious means.
    http://www.globalresearch.ca/u-s-holds-the-world-record-of-killings-innocent-civilians/5393789
    True the USA is exactly guilty of that as well.

    dougman I would say focus on cleaning up your own disaster mess of a country before pointing at others. Performing air-strikes that result in killing non combatants is not doing the USA any good.

    So really Robert Pogson in fact dougman condone those behaviours and is mostly upset because Canada is not going in his preferred direction of cultural domination.

  8. dougman wrote, “So you condone…”

    None of that is true.

  9. dougman says:

    So you condone, miscreant’s illegally migrating to a country, propagating like mice and demanding laws to be changed to suit their ways. Followed with consolidation of power while shoving their theocracy down everyone’s throat. Oh, and if you do not agree then they murder you in the most egregious means.

    Canadian liberalism at it’s finest!

  10. dougman wrote, “makes perfect sense.”

    Replace “home” with “ice-cream”. It makes perfect sense. [SARCASM] Yep. They’re both nouns, alright.

  11. dougman says:

    “This is not an analogy to what’s happening with illegal immigration.”

    LOL…replace “home” with “nation” or perhaps “country” and it makes perfect sense.

  12. dougman wrote, “people break into your home, take up residence and have children. What would you do? Obviously, you would have them removed.”

    This is not an analogy to what’s happening with illegal immigration. While illegal immigrants may cross the border illegally or overstay their visas illegally, they are not breaking into anyone’s home. They find work and rent/buy/share their own homes. Children of illegal immigrants are not illegal immigrants. If you deport their parents you may be adding the children to the welfare rolls or giving them child-support. Do what the Saudis do and require them to raise their children to adulthood before taking action… [SARCASM]

    Really, it doesn’t make a lot of sense to deport someone with the initiative and hard working nature of immigrants illegal or not. They add to the economy.

  13. dougman says:

    Hmmmmm…this sounds like a definite plan.

    Just show up in Canada then your a Canadian. You can get Canadian citizenship when you live in Ohio. Then you can get a check from the Canadian government for welfare when you collect welfare in Ohio.

  14. dougman says:

    “he goes around the world making $billions by any means possible”

    So sayeth the envious Canadian.

    “deporting (born of illegal immigrants) children born in USA”

    Fixed that for you. Lets see, people break into your home, take up residence and have children. What would you do? Obviously, you would have them removed.

  15. admfubar wrote, “you forgot “deplorable””.

    That terminology is too polite for sentient beings. Trump is outrageous and his followers are often ignorant of the bigger picture or outright inhumane. The idea of deporting children born in USA, the idea that international trade is negative, the idea that muslims are out to get them… These are all disgusting concepts embraced by a significant number of followers and Trump himself. Trump’s hypocrisy is astronomical in scope. While telling USAians what’s good for them, he goes around the world making $billions by any means possible fair or foul and suggesting that there’s no conflict of interest between his global operations and running the USAian government… He makes Hillary’s negatives seem like a blemish on an apple compared to his rotten-to-the-core instincts.

  16. admfubar says:

    you forgot “deplorable”

Leave a Reply