Trump – Lowlife Scum Sociopath

“If you look at his wife, she was standing there. She had nothing to say… Maybe she wasn’t allowed to have anything to say.”
 
See Fury as Trump mocks Muslim soldier’s mother Ghazala Khan
Khizr Khan was right. If Trump had read the constitution of USA Trump certainly did not understand it. Folks have freedom or religion and freedom of speech. They are allowed to worship or not. They are allowed to speak or not without being attacked personally by the would-be president. Trump is evil scum without human emotions, like a venomous snake. He is not worthy of any respect, certainly not the office of POTUS. Like a venomous snake, people should avoid Trump and stay very far away.

About Robert Pogson

I am a retired teacher in Canada. I taught in the subject areas where I have worked for almost forty years: maths, physics, chemistry and computers. I love hunting, fishing, picking berries and mushrooms, too.
This entry was posted in family, politics and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

28 Responses to Trump – Lowlife Scum Sociopath

  1. dougman, apparently not realizing that truth is everlasting, wrote, ” that is sixteen years ago and she was killed in another country! Your response is very weak. Try harder next time.”

    Who put you in charge of the rules and why does the date support your argument?

    See also “divorce by murder” case. Divorce was seen as dishonourable, murder acceptable, so it’s the same mindset as “honour killing”. No muslims involved. India involved. QED

  2. dougman says:

    “Suppose his immigration work dried ”

    LOL…with the flood of Muslim immigrants, unlikely.

    “Most likely the site was DOSed or defaced by Trump’s bullies.”

    HAH!..and you speak about me grasping at straws? Sir, you just grasped the entire straw dispenser!

  3. dougman wrote, “This development is significant, as his website proved that he financially benefits from unfettered pay-to-play Muslim migration into America.”

    … or that he has a great deal of expertise in several fields of law including immigration. That’s not relevant to anything. Suppose his immigration work dried up (more likely Trump would increase it greatly as folks sought legal means to get around obstacles). Then he’d just concentrate more in other areas.
    Areas of Practice

    • Complex Litigation Electronic Discovery
    • HIPAA Compliance & Audit
    • E2 Treaty Investors, EB5 Investments & Related Immigration Services

    This is yet another case where dougman grasps at straws to justify the unjustifiable. Yes, if you want everything to be pink you can wear rose-coloured glasses. Take them off and see all the light.

    Most likely the site was DOSed or defaced by Trump’s bullies.

  4. dougman says:

    BTW: That Muslim fool that trash talked Trump? Khizr Khan, the Muslim Gold Star father that Democrats and their allies media wide have been using to hammer GOP presidential nominee Donald J. Trump, has deleted his law firm’s website from the Internet.

    This development is significant, as his website proved that he financially benefits from unfettered pay-to-play Muslim migration into America.

    https://web.archive.org/web/20160802121411/http://www.kmkhanlaw.com/

  5. dougman says:

    Died: 8 June 2000
    Location: Ludhiana, Punjab, India

    Wow, that is sixteen years ago and she was killed in another country! Your response is very weak. Try harder next time.

  6. dougman wrote, “the millions of Indian Hindus who have immigrated to the West do not bring the practice along with them”.

    False. See CBC

  7. dougman says:

    Pogson, trumps the line of an apologist for Muslim culture and civilization, by rushing to herald the upsurge in Hindu (and Sikh) honor killings as evidence that the practice is “a universal problem, not an Islamic issue.”

    The honor killings of India are perpetuated by sociocultural factors largely specific to India, However, the millions of Indian Hindus who have immigrated to the West do not bring the practice along with them.

    Amazing huh? I bet you can not find one Indian that has immigrated to the west that has performed an “honor killing”. I suggest you watch the documentary Honor Diaries and educate yourself.

    Council on American–Islam Relations (CAIR) does not want you to see it. Wonder why?? CAIR is a Muslim Brotherhood creation, conceived as the primo American public-relations firm for Islamic supremacists, particularly Hamas — a task CAIR pulls off by masquerading as a “civil rights” organization.

    By the way Hamas is a terrorist organization.

  8. dougman wrote, “You do not see any other demographic killing it’s family members for being “too westernized””

    Oh no? Check out northern India where families in remote regions and even in cities kill. Often they are hindi, not muslim. Then there’s Africa where witch doctors and such still have influence. Then there are caucasians who kill each other quite regularly. Your numbers mean nothing without norms. Out of 2000 million muslims there are a few thousand dishonourable killings each year, 4000/2000000000 X 100 thousand= 0.2 per hundred thousand per annum. What is the ordinary murder rate amongst USAians for instance, a bit under ten per hundred thousand? They are the dangerous ones. You just want another excuse to hate muslims. Don’t spread you filthy ideas here. We don’t buy it. I’ll grant you Islam has issues but the scale of the problem is dwarfed by violence in most “civilized” countries. Islam is a religion of peace. The name means submission to god, nothing to do with killing women. There are deviants in every religion or community but muslims are very law-abiding people by and large, not a problem.

  9. kurkosdr wrote, “Islamic religion is engineered to make believers unable and unwilling to be assimilated into other cultures”.

    Nonsense. Islam was conceived as providing a moral compass to desert-dwellers in the Arabian peninsula. It grew to have more general applicability, nothing to do with locking people in or out. I’ve lived and worked in diverse places and communities. Every change of situation introduces stresses to change or remain the same. Young people adapt well, older folks with more difficulty. Religion may or may not be part of that. One can be of any religion anywhere although it’s easier in big cities than small towns. It’s hard to live anywhere without eating the local food, living in local housing, or using local transportation. By the second or third generation most immigrants are quite comfortable after a move by a family. Individuals find it much harder and they often move on or invite family to come on over. People belong together. This is the human condition, nothing specific about muslims.

  10. kurkosdr says:

    People like Pog forget that Islamic religion is engineered to make believers unable and unwilling to be assimilated into other cultures. Islam restricts human liberty, human desires and human expression of desires so much, that the sheer egoism of not wanting to admit that all those years of greatly restricting themselves were sunk cost, means they do NOT want to stop restricting themselves, but instead want to start restricting others too. In plain English, they think that “if I was exposed to it for so many years and had to make so many sacrifices, it MUST be for a noble cause, so everyone must be bound by it”. This is precisely the reason most muslims want to make European countries the same as the countries they fleed from. It’s basic physcology. They don’t want to admit they spent their lives so far restricting themselves for a tin god (aka for nothing) while everyone else was living a free life.

  11. kurkosdr wrote, “What if the tax is phased-in?”

    There’s no incentive for halfway measures. There are agreements in place. The only way to force negotiation is to invoke the inevitable termination clause. Then there will be a date set when agreement ends and chaos begins. Is USA going to impose a 5% tariff if China imposes 30%? Nope. The alternatives are agreement or trade war. We have agreement and USA may invite a mad man to start a trade war or not.

  12. kurkosdr says:

    What I am trying to say is that there are lots of blue-collar workers, and more crucially fired blue-collar workers (because NAFTA shipped their jobs away) or McDonald’s workers or unemployed people who wish they were still blue-collar workers, who are seeing all that wealth being spent on Chinese or Mexican or mostly Mexican-made goods and are feeling “left out” and useless, and then Trump come along and promises to make buying ‘merican goods mandatory. Instead, all Hilary has to offer is more NAFTA-like deals and more jobs going overseas. Even Obama once said that “these are low-value jobs and aren’t coming back”.

    BTW, is it possible for Trump to walk away from NAFTA and phase-in taxes for imported goods? Probably yes, probably not. But the key to winning votes is in the promise.

    Get over it. Muslims are OK people.

    Bahahaha… snort *cough* *cough* They pretend to be nice people, ’till they become an “election swinging minority”. Then, they will start demanding “decency laws” (aka “forbid too revealing clothes” laws), start organizing “anti-drunk patrols” (like it happens in Britain) and demanding pork is banned because it offends them (France is already thinking about banning pork in school lunches, because it “offends the muslim” and the current party wants their vote). A muslim will never put human laws above Sharia law, only temporarily pretend to do so, because doing so would mean they ‘d have to admit spent their lifes of restricting their freedom for something that is below human laws and hence they were idiots all those years. Egoism prevents most humans who happen to be muslim from doing that.

  13. kurkosdr says:

    Well, if Trump slaps on a 30% duty, 30%. If he bans imports, infinity… You have to consider that it takes years to bring factories into production and days to do the stupid stuff he said he would do.

    What if the tax is phased-in? Like any kind of this tax is?

  14. dougman says:

    “dougman, getting his hate on”, if “getting my hate on” is Canadian for stating facts, so be it.

    Oh yes, Wikipedia is a far more reliable source then a retired Ph’d *rolls-eyes*

  15. dougman, getting his hate on, wrote, “In Europe, 96 percent of honor killings were committed by Muslims.”

    Well, what fraction of the world’s muslims are in Europe? That statistic is almost meaningless for this discussion. In Africa and India a lot of killings occur amongst non-muslims. Where is your statistic for that? Face it. Muslims are peaceful people and like everyone else there are angry folks who do bad things in the muslim world as elsewhere. It’s always been thus and nothing Trump will do will change that.

    See Wikipedia:
    “In the Roman Empire the Roman law Lex Julia de adulteriis coercendis implemented by Augustus Caesar permitted the murder of daughters and their lovers who committed adultery at the hands of their fathers and also permitted the murder of the adulterous wife’s lover at the hand of her husband.
     
    The Napoleonic Code did not allow women to murder unfaithful husbands, while it permitted the murder of unfaithful women by their husbands”
    . Nothing about Islam in that, eh?

    “France’s Article 324 inspired laws in other Arab countries”… so that’s not based on Islam at all.
    “Killing one’s wife or sister for tarnishing her honor or that of her family has not received approval from any Islamic scholar of any note, in either medieval or modern era.”

    Get over it. Muslims are OK people.

  16. dougman says:

    “BTW, “honour killing” is not a muslim thing.”

    Let’s look at the data, you love data right?

    In 2014, Phyllis Chesler, an Emerita Professor of Psychology at City University of New York and a legendary feminist leader, analyzed 172 incidents and 230 victims of honor killings based primarily on information obtained from English-language media around the world, and reported the statements below about honor killings globally. This information covers the period from 1989-2009.

    Chesler’s report is one of the few summary description of victims worldwide; the findings are in line with other case studies, project interviews, and the online and legal searches.

    – The average age of honor killing victims worldwide is 23.

    – Women constitute 93 percent of victims.

    – Half of the victims are daughters and sisters of the perpetrator and a quarter are wives or girlfriends. The remaining victims are mothers, aunts, nieces, cousins, uncles, or non-relatives.

    – There are two general populations of victims—younger females with an average age of 17, and older females with an average age of 36.

    – Two-thirds of honor killings are perpetrated by some type of family collaboration.

    – Murder by the family of origin is highest in Europe (72%) and lowest in North America (49%).

    – 42 percent of honor killings involve multiple perpetrators.

    – In North America, 91 percent of victims were murdered for being “too westernized,”
    and 43 percent of victims in Muslim countries were killed for this reason.

    – In North America, fathers were involved 100 percent of the time when the daughter
    victim was 18 years or younger.

    – In Europe, 96 percent of honor killings were committed by Muslims.

    So you can set there and deflect all you want, but the data says otherwise. You do not see any other demographic killing it’s family members for being “too westernized”, honor killings of women are just one of the many reasons why no Western country should allow Muslim immigration. Islam is a religion of jihad and misogyny and they just do not fit in.

  17. kurkosdr wrote, “How much higher would the price of every type of product (the types of product bought by most people anyway”.

    Well, if Trump slaps on a 30% duty, 30%. If he bans imports, infinity… You have to consider that it takes years to bring factories into production and days to do the stupid stuff he said he would do. POTUS has four years to get things done. There’s executive orders which Rs have condemned and working things through Congress. It’s a disastrous blow or a whimpering few years of more excuses. In the end nothing will change but Trump will have had years to suck on the teat of government. Judge a tree by the fruit of it. Trump is all talk and no sensible action.

  18. kurkosdr says:

    or more crucially = and more crucially

  19. kurkosdr says:

    The autoworker will find goods made in China dramatically increase in price.

    How much higher would the price of every type of product (the types of product bought by most people anywa. such as smartphones and TVs) would be if they were made in the USA, assuming automation would be used for SOME of the production process?

    I haven’t managed to find any solid based-on-research info or estimate on that. It could be any number of percentage points.

    Unless you anti-Trumpers manage to nail this number down Trump will keep spewing his protectionism ideology and the blue collars or more crucially the people who wished they were blue collars will keep gathering around him.

  20. dougman wrote, “With enough guidance and direction mass-changes can be made on grand scales.”

    That’s true, but such disruption has all kinds of results good and bad. War-time exigencies don’t have any place in peace-time. That was not a free market and human rights were trampled.

    dougman also wrote, “if you condemn Muslim honor killings in Canada, you might find yourself the subject of investigation and convicted of a crime.”

    That’s utter nonsense. Murder is murder. Nothing about free speech. BTW, “honour killing” is not a muslim thing. At various times many families, groups, communities and nations have done such things. It’s a tribal thing. Nothing to do with religions which generally proscribe murder.

  21. dougman says:

    “The autoworker will find goods made in China dramatically increase in price.”

    That’s entirely the point!

    “Such disruptions could last years as it takes years for an economy to shift gears.”

    Ummm… Mar 28 1941, Ground was broken for Ford Motor Company’s Willow Run plant, which used Henry Ford’s mass-production technology to build B-24 bomber planes for World War II. Willow Run eventually employed over 42,000 people and by 1944, the plant was producing one plane every hour. By the end of the war in 1945, more than 8,600 B-24s had been built in three years.

    Conclusion: With enough guidance and direction mass-changes can be made on grand scales. America beat the Nazi’s back from Europe and landed on the moon within ten-years.

    Besides playing hockey, drinking beer and eating poutine, what have Canadians done?

    Gosh you don’t even have free speech. Section 1 of the Constitution Act 1982 gives Canadians the right to free speech, but with “reasonable limits.” This ensures that almost anything one says can be considered unconstitutional and subject to legal prosecution. You have a right to speak your mind, but be careful of what you say.

    Then there’s section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act. This prohibits the “communication of hate messages.”

    So in essence, if you condemn Muslim honor killings in Canada, you might find yourself the subject of investigation and convicted of a crime.

    Beauty, Eh!

  22. kurkosdr wrote, “the mere promise of protectionism is enough to make the unionized blue collars or more crucially people who wish they were blue collars shout “Trump! Trump!”

    There may be some of that but everyone loses with protectionism. The autoworker will find goods made in China dramatically increase in price. Such disruptions could last years as it takes years for an economy to shift gears. By the time the damage is really done, Trump will have died or retired.

    Free Trade is not just about Mexico and China. It’s about the world’s economy and folks like Trump who think it’s OK to “walk away from the table” can quickly do a lot of damage that can take many years to recover. It is much better to tweak trade agreements than to replace them. Economies are fragile, large or small. See the price of oil. Imagine every product and commodity on Earth having a similar glitch due to Trumpism.

  23. kurkosdr says:

    You don’t (want to) understand protectionism, right? Everyone hates the “chicken tax” on imported trucks, but UAW workers are glad that it exists and makes trucks made on American soil (not necessarily by the big 3) more competitive.

    So, the mere promise of protectionism is enough to make the unionized blue collars or more crucially people who wish they were blue collars shout “Trump! Trump!)

    “We Canadians saw Canadian jobs moved to USA when the tariffs dropped. USAian companies no longer needed Canadian branch-plants. For instance, Winchester quit making stuff in Canada so prices of ammunition and firearms rose. ”
    I meant Mexico and China.

  24. kurkosdr wrote, “If you were someone working in manufacturing in the US and were seeing jobs in your sector flying to Mexico and Canada all the time because of the NAFTA and other free trade deals the Clintons signed”.

    Utter nonsense. We Canadians saw Canadian jobs moved to USA when the tariffs dropped. USAian companies no longer needed Canadian branch-plants. For instance, Winchester quit making stuff in Canada so prices of ammunition and firearms rose. At the same time Canadian companies folded because the USAian companies had dramatically increased markets and lower costs. e.g. Canadians pay for MediCare through taxes while USAian companies did not. So, there was an advantage to running manufacturing in USA compared to Canada. That’s all water under the bridge. Economies adjust to such short-term changes. Going back to the damned tariff barriers would certainly not be advantageous to any just creating another disturbance to all economies. That’s stupid. Free trade is the way forward just like the Internet or computers. No one conceives of life without those yet Trump thinks it’s easy to “walk away from the table” on re-opened cans of worms negotiations. NAFTA took close to a decade to negotiate so it could be years before Trump managed to replace it with anything and there’s no guarantee the replacement would be any better.

  25. dougman wrote, “I guess the same thing happened here, she was mad to stand there with her husband, but not allowed to speak. “

    She has spoken publicly on the matter. She simply said she was too upset to talk about her dead son in public. She could have remained off the stage or stood behind her husband. Instead she stood with him. Only really black-hearted folks would read anything else into it.

    Canadians have opened up their homes to muslim refugees in huge numbers. My home is not particularly welcoming to muslims simply because we eat pork etc. but I would have no concerns having a family stay for a while. I suggested it to TLW but she has so many other irons in the fire.

  26. dougman says:

    Who would your candidate be to pick? Obviously not a liar like Clinton..

    Why didn’t Muslim woman speak??

    In Muslim cultures, women are not allowed to drive, and are made to ride in the back of the car. I guess the same thing happened here, she was mad to stand there with her husband, but not allowed to speak.

    BTW: Have you opened you home to any refugee Muslims yet?

  27. kurkosdr says:

    Mexico and Canada = Mexico and China (though some jobs fly to Canada too)

  28. kurkosdr says:

    If you were someone working in manufacturing in the US and were seeing jobs in your sector flying to Mexico and Canada all the time because of the NAFTA and other free trade deals the Clintons signed, and then some demagogue venomous snake comes and promises to abolish those free trade deals and put a tax on imported goods, in order to force all those college kids, pensioners and white-collars to buy ‘merican-manufactured goods, you ‘d vote for the venomous snake. Facts and other people’s rights just get in the way in this situation.

    You seem to forget that not everyone is happy that the USA is transforming from a manufacturing economy to a services and Intellectual Property generation economy, in fact some blue collars are quite angry, because they cannot get employed in those jobs and their survival is threatened. Then there are people who work at Wallmart of McDonald’s and wish they had a more comfortable unionized job in the manufacturing sector like their dad probably had. Of course, trade wars rarely result in job creation, but in elections, it’s all about the promise…

    Add in the anti-abortion Bible-Belters and the holier-than-thou Republican women opposing abortion (but when *they* have an unwanted pregnancy fly to some Blue state to get rid of their own little problem), plus extreme libertarian loons stockpiling gold and ammo, and the demagogue venomous snake managed to built himself an electoral base. Your “people should avoid Trump and stay very far away” remark looks out of place, because the people I mentioned above have made their decision.

    PS: The Clintos made no real promises towards white heterosexual males during the DNC, apparently assuming the vast majority of women, Latino men and black men will be on their side by default. Big mistake that will cost them…

Leave a Reply