Murdering Bastards Need Killing, Not Coddling

“Twenty people, most said to be foreigners, have been killed in an attack by suspected Islamist militants on a cafe in Bangladesh, the army says.
 
Gunmen stormed the Holey Artisan Bakery cafe in Dhaka late on Friday before troops entered almost 12 hours later.”
 
See Bangladesh siege: Twenty killed at Holey Artisan Bakery in Dhaka
Sigh. How many times do we have to see bad guys slaughter innocents while police waited patiently outside to “wait them out”? These murdering bastards killed people with knives while police waited. There was nothing to be gained waiting hours before making a vigorous entry. Gather forces. Make multiple simultaneous entries. Save lives by killing bad guys.

About Robert Pogson

I am a retired teacher in Canada. I taught in the subject areas where I have worked for almost forty years: maths, physics, chemistry and computers. I love hunting, fishing, picking berries and mushrooms, too.
This entry was posted in politics, technology and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

17 Responses to Murdering Bastards Need Killing, Not Coddling

  1. oiaohm says:

    http://www.islamswomen.com/marriage/islams_position_on_polygamy.php
    dougman polygamy is mostly a bad point to look at. Without taking in Sharia law Australian law location was very much the same on legal responsibility over it and that goes back to very old english and Jewish laws. Yes polygamy is in the Jewish Torah and original Jewish laws pre-dating Islam.

    Polygamy is a pre islam thing. Islam Sharia Law just happened to define rules if people kept up that behaviour of Polygamy and Islam Sharia Law mostly just restating the rules that are in the original Jewish laws over it. So there are lot of countries with the Jewish Law base that need to change nothing to come into alignment with Sharia Law over polygamy.

    female genital mutilation
    This is a interesting one you hear brought up all the time.
    Sharia Law and the Quran in fact make no mention of the practice. So there is no Islam religion reason to perform it at all. Its nothing more than a cultural hang over of cultures prior to Islam. The Quran on the other hand does mention that cultural pracs like slavery and so on should be phased out. So the Quran itself is anti female genital mutilation in the sense its meant to be phased out so you should not be doing actions to keep the phased out region prac going. Yes female genital mutilation falls in the same camp as making representation of false gods.

    This is the problem lot of places Quran is exact match to old Jewish or Quran mandating the end of particular actions people directly link to being Muslim/Islam.

    Lot of issues would just disappear of the Quran was obeyed on the so called Muslim side.

  2. dougman says:

    “So, you want muslim women and children to starve? Go jump in the lake on a stormy day.”

    What does Sharia law have to do with Muslims starving? Nothing at all, at best it is a case of blind Canuck smugness, at it’s best. What a great Canadian, eh?

    http://www.therebel.media/liberals_niqab_decision_canada_accepts_sharia_law

  3. dougman wrote, “The provincial governments of Canada for years have tacitly recognized Sharia law for Canada’s Muslim minority by sending multiple welfare checks to polygamous Muslim men who raise multiple families in Canada.”

    So, you want muslim women and children to starve? Go jump in the lake on a stormy day.

  4. dougman says:

    FactCheck.org, about as reliable as Snopes.com

    You can quote percentages all day, but it still shows that the majority of Muslim migrants are male, look at the images in Europe! That’s not the demographics of a civilian population displaced by war, that’s the demographics of an army

    What happens when these Muslims demand shariah law in Canadian provinces. Wait, they already have!

    The provincial governments of Canada for years have tacitly recognized Sharia law for Canada’s Muslim minority by sending multiple welfare checks to polygamous Muslim men who raise multiple families in Canada. In the past, Muslims in Ontario attempted to make their provincial government set aside its laws and have only the Sharia law apply to Muslims.

    Then you have this tidbit, 70 Muslim organizations advocate Sharia Bill 59 to criminalize criticism of Islam.

    http://www.torontosun.com/2015/09/04/quebecs-bill-59-panders-to-islamists

  5. dougman says:

    “Perhaps you should think a bit what it means to be a refugee.”

    Please explain why should anyone think like a “fugee”?

    I won’t ever be a refugee since I am an American. No country would let us in as refugees. All I can do is get a gun and die fighting. In the meantime don’t help them by wasting money on human charities. People just turn on you if you help them survive.

  6. dougman says:

    “What would happen if war ravaged your country? Would you ship the women and children out first or leave them to fend for themselves? ”

    Hell no, Americans wouldn’t leave, we would take back our country by force of arms. Its been done once before by nothing but rabble folk, uneducated and politically illiterate people.

  7. dougman wrote, “Are you senile?”

    See FactCheck.org
    “The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees — which refers refugees for resettlement in other countries — says there are more than 4 million registered Syrian refugees. Its figures on the demographic makeup of refugees is based on available data on the 2.1 million who were registered by the UNHCR in Egypt, Iraq, Jordan and Lebanon. (Another 1.9 million Syrian refugees were registered by the Government of Turkey, and more than 24,000 were registered in North Africa.)
    UNHCR’s data show that 50.5 percent of refugees are women. Females age 18 to 59 make up 23.9 percent of the refugees, while males in that age group make up 21.8 percent.
    Even younger males — age 12 to 17 — represent 6.5 percent of refugees, while females that age are 6.1 percent. The majority of refugees — 51.1 percent — are under age 17, including 38.5 percent who are younger than 12 years old. These numbers were as of Sept. 6.”

    So, perhaps you should think a bit before repeating lies/damned lies to support your crazy ideas. What would happen if war ravaged your country? Would you ship the women and children out first or leave them to fend for themselves? Perhaps you should think a bit what it means to be a refugee.

  8. dougman wrote, “decided to exclude single men from the resettlement program”.

    We can’t take them all so we prioritize. That’s proper. I think women and children should go first and families before single males who are much more able to survive on their own.

  9. dougman says:

    Also, what about Justin Trudeau’s decision to welcome 25,000 Syrian refugees to Canada, but decided to exclude single men from the resettlement program.

    Imagine that, a party member of the Liberal Party of Canada says no to Muslim males.

    Now why is that? Obviously he knows something, lets see.

    “This is not the ideal scenario to protect vulnerable people – women and children and men too. But I think what happened in Paris has really changed the dynamic and public opinion”

    Ahh, so the Religion of Peace attacks in Paris, is what prompted his response.

  10. dougman wrote, “with the mass majority of them being Muslim males, and one in four younger Muslims say suicide bombings to defend their religion are acceptable”.

    Facts not in evidence. No immigrant stream has a majority of males. Virtually ever society has a preponderance of females, more so in streams of refugees from war zones where men are killed off regularly. The murdering bastards are not defending any religion. They offend all. They are a death cult, not a religion.

  11. dougman says:

    “Without immigration, Canada’s population would be declining sooner or later.”

    LOL…with the mass majority of them being Muslim males, and one in four younger Muslims say suicide bombings to defend their religion are acceptable, you come to the conclusion that a firestorm is approaching.

    Lets watch Gavin again:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_Az5FCe6yc

  12. dougman quoth an article that quoth The National Post, from 2011.

    “The reasons for Muslim growth in both Canada and the U.S. is the result of increased immigration and slightly higher-than-average birth rates.”

    Yes. Canada has accepted waves of immigrants from every troubled spot on the globe for as long as Canada has existed. I remember the influx from Europe after WWII. It’s not a problem. It’s an opportunity for growth. Without immigration, Canada’s population would be declining sooner or later. There have been problems with each wave of immigration causing some resentment/rivalry but we adapted and overcame those obstacles. Almost everyone I know was an immigrant or is descended from immigrants. It’s OK.

  13. dougman says:

    You misunderstood what I stated, but I will clarify further.

    Canada, has over one million Muslims currently, it isn’t by any stretch of the imagination that this number eventually surpass the existing population.

    http://www.immigration.ca/fr/2015/131-canada-immigration-news-articles/2011/february/564-canada-s-muslim-population-rapidly-expanding.html

  14. dougman wrote, “the Muslim population doubles every ten years”.

    That’s absolute nonsense. If that were true, the world would be majority muslim today. It would have been so centuries ago.

  15. dougman says:

    Yes, the “religion of peace”, coming soon to a town near you!

    Coincidentally Robert, did you fast with a Muslim friend this past month?

    https://twitter.com/fastwithmuslims

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQUfJhqsjTo

    See where this is going? Soon your country will be entirely Muslim by about 2061, as the Muslim population doubles every ten years. http://imgur.com/a/7TkxP

  16. dougman says:

    Too bad these people were not armed. People today are told not to resist, accept whatever is being done to you.

Leave a Reply