Review Of The Record On Adoption Of FLOSS In Turkish Government

Hüseyin Tolu, a PhD student at University of Bristol, wrote a paper after reviewing public documents related to use of FLOSS in IT in the government of Turkey:
“I first review the national ICT policy in Turkey through selecting the most appropriate and elite government documents to have a brief outline of the obstacles for the use of FOSS in public institutions, as well as a genetic perception of the Government views on FOSS that are driven by/ related to the concept of not governing ‘National ICT Policy and Strategy’. To support this, I argue how FOSS is deliberately ignored in ICT projects due to obviously (a) institutional inertia, (b) path dependence, (c) ungovernable ICT changes, and, arguably, (d) corruption in new public management. I then attempted to investigate possible causal and dependency relationships of the currently established interlinks between the Government and unmanageable ICT changes to conclude that the Government has failed in making written ICT Policies and in establishing pervasive and trustworthy (flexible) ICT ecosystems, which recognise either a balanced development between FOSS and PCSS or a FOSS favourable system.”

It documents a camouflage pattern stifling efforts to reform IT in general and using FLOSS in particular. He actually claims that Pardus, a Turkish distro, was developed as leverage in negotiating lower licensing fees from M$. “The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) has developed Pardus Operating Systems (OSs) (nationally distributed Linux distro) between 2003 and 2012. After ten years of Pardus development, the Pardus project has not achieved its initial or subsequent objectives as declared in 2004 & 2011, and has mistakenly diverted away from those objectives to become Pardus Fraud-Debian, as Turkey’s present day accepted open source software solution. Crucially, the Pardus project has been deliberately utilised as leverage to gain better ongoing deals from the Microsoft Corporation.”

That’s the lock-in of a starving slave begging the master for food… The reverse should be true. Turkey should tell M$ where to go. Governments need interoperability and vendor independence. The only way to get that at the moment is with FLOSS. Otherwise governments are beholden to M$’s many costs, abusive EULA, malware, and re-re-reboots forever. On the brighter side, the paper does show that FLOSS is lurking everywhere in governmental IT, just below the surface, and the resources exist to bring FLOSS to the surface in short order. All it will take is political leadership as we see in Brazil, Germany, Russia, India, much of Europe, etc. Governments are supposed to serve their own people, not Microsoft.

See Expendable ‘Written’ ICT Policies in a Digital Era, No Broken Promise.

More at Techrights

About Robert Pogson

I am a retired teacher in Canada. I taught in the subject areas where I have worked for almost forty years: maths, physics, chemistry and computers. I love hunting, fishing, picking berries and mushrooms, too.
This entry was posted in technology and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Review Of The Record On Adoption Of FLOSS In Turkish Government

  1. dougman says:

    To those who believe that M$ is paid a lot of money for its software, it’s important to remember that usage does not equate to revenue. As the message from M$ puts it:

    “Software piracy rates run as high as over 90 percent in many developing countries.”

    “It’s easier for our software to compete with Linux when there’s piracy than when there’s not. As long as they’re going to steal it, we want them to steal ours. They’ll get sort of addicted, and then we’ll somehow figure out how to collect sometime in the next decade.”
    –Bill Gates

    Linux and BSD is like having a nice girlfriend. They don’t require a whole lot of maintenance but aren’t overly flashy. If you screw something up you do need to know an arcane language to smooth things over.

    Windows is like dating a two dollar hooker. You’re paying for something that you can get for free elsewhere, and are running the risk of viruses.

Leave a Reply