A “Nantucket boat ride” happens when you hook into a whale and it tows your boat… This can be dangerous. It was for the jury. Their fearless leader had no idea what “prior art” meant and decided no prior art but Apple’s mattered…
"The software on the Apple side could not be placed into the processor on the prior art and vice versa. That means they are not interchangeable. That changed everything right there."
Sigh… I cannot see any way that the judge will allow the findings of the jury to stand. That makes no sense at all. I could not understand it in the video.
see 2:53 onward for the part in question.
This foreman demonstrates colosal ignorance defeating common sense. Prior art is OS/CPU-independent. Patents are about function.
Later, the guy goes on to avoid the question of why he felt the need to punish Samsung rather than merely compensating Apple, compounding his error. The jury’s findings are nonsensical based on bias by the jurors, not evidence in the case. Later he grabbed numbers not in evidence to calculate the damage Apple had sustained.
He said he looked at the case from the viewpoint that the “patents were mine” in order to decide matters. What’s with that? This guy dragged the jury around by the nose.