I am so tired of comments made on the web that such and such software is better because it has more features than another. Recently Rizzo of M$ said Excel is just a million years ahead of what Google Docs provides. Does that even matter?
The last time I read any count Office was up to 300 “features”. A dog with more fleas is not a better dog. What matters in software is whether the software works for you. If all you are doing is formatting some HTML, TinyMCE may well be enough.
A lot of features added to Office these days are stuff that really does not matter except to encourage folks to buy another licence. Otherwise, those features would have been incorporated years ago. Why has M$ held back on all that innovation? I have been word-processing for ages and there are many tasks we did in the old days that we still do today. There is no compelling reason to buy new software to do old jobs when you already have access to the old software.
Google says their Google Docs will do what most people need to do. That’s enough. It is very wasteful of programmers’ time and licensing fees to pay again for what you already have.