We’ve been here a while – search
Tags2015 - Year of the GNU/Linux Desktop Acer adoption AMD android Apple ARM China cloud Debian Dell desktop education firearms FLOSS garden GNU/Linux google government HP hunting Intel Lenovo LibreOffice Linux market share migration netbook politics renewable energy Samsung security server small cheap computers smart phone software-patents Solo EV tablets that other OS thin client thin clients trolls Trumpism Ubuntu uptake
My MissionMy observations and opinions about IT are based on 40 years of use in science and technology and lately, in education. I like IT that is fast, cost-effective and reliable. I do not care whether my solution is the same as yours. I like to think for myself.
My first use of GNU/Linux in 2001 was so remarkably better than what I had been using, I feel it is important work to share GNU/Linux with the world. I have been blessed by working in schools where students and school systems have benefited by good, modular software easily installed in most systems.
I have shown GNU/Linux to thousands of students and hundreds of teachers over the years and will continue in some way doing that until I die in spite of the opposition.
Tag Archives: software-patents
Here we go again. The soon-to-expire-of-old-age software patent on long filenames is bouncing around German courts and was ruled invalid… “Microsoft’s FAT (File Allocation Table) patent, which concerns a "common name space for long and short filenames" was invalidated on … Continue reading
Finally, the uproar about software-patents has penetrated to the inner sanctum of the US Supreme Court. They can no longer fiddle while Rome burns. Being able to repatent the entirety of human history by putting some idea into software will … Continue reading
You know the story. Give flies, mice, baboons or patent-lawyers the perfect environment and they will be fruitful and multiply until we all starve to death or something drastic happens. “Between 2007 and 2011, two-thirds of defendants in patent litigation … Continue reading
Unlike some patent-trolls who do nothing but sue and threaten to sue, M$ now has a token-smartphone factory, Nokia. 2-3% share is “practising” but the announced deal is really about the patents, valid or not… “Microsoft will have the most … Continue reading
Governments shouldn’t have to do this. It’s obvious that software is obvious and subject to copyright. Software has to be obvious or stupid computes wouldn’t be able to figure out what has to be done. Software is obvious like telephone … Continue reading
“Secondary considerations evidence can establish that “an invention appearing to have been obvious in light of the prior art was not” and may be “the most probative and cogent evidence in the record.” Transocean, 699 F.3d at 1349 (quoting Stratoflex, … Continue reading
“On Friday the 7th of June the German Parliament decided upon a joint motion to limit software patents (see English translation by BIKT). The Parliament urges the German Government to take steps to limit the granting of patents on computer … Continue reading
It’s cute to see Apple and Google cooperating, at least on applications for mobile devices: That’s the way IT/tech companies should work. It’s much more efficient than suing each other. Only a couple of years ago, Apple’s Steve delayed death … Continue reading
“Let’s be clear: if all of these claims, including the system claims, are not patent-eligible, this case is the death of hundreds of thousands of patents, including all business method, financial system, and software patents as well as many computer … Continue reading
That’s a good idea according to the German parliament. It should be obvious that software is a copyright work and should not be patentable. Software patents are an illegal extension of copyright power into vague and controversial forms. “Software patents … Continue reading
Apple v Samsung is not over yet… “The claim 19 of the ‘381 patent that Apple relied upon so heavily against Samsung at trial, the bounce back patent, has now been finally rejected by the USPTO, as it ruled there … Continue reading
A company as productive of real inventions as IBM should be ashamed to support software-patents but that’s what they do in a recent amicus brief: “That the vast majority of computer-implemented inventions are patent eligible is beyond debate. Computer-implemented inventions … Continue reading