The nonsensical software-patent that USA has tried to foist on the world, destroying motivation to innovate and taxing true innovation,“back in January, art units at the USPTO rejected applications based on Section 101 of US Patent law only about 24% of the time. Section 101 covers what is patent eligible, and was the key part in the decision in the Alice case. Effectively, in the Alice ruling, the Supreme Court said that just doing something on a generic computer wasn’t patent eligible under Section 101. Following that ruling, in July, the rejection rate jumped to 78%. Yes, from 24% in January to 78% in June.” is going down the drain. USPTO is rejecting most such applications and invalidating many already issued. In a few years we will wake up an all the trouble M$ and others have caused the world will just be a fading memory.
We’ve been here a while – search
Tags2015 - Year of the GNU/Linux Desktop Acer adoption AMD android Apple ARM China cloud Debian Dell desktop education firearms FLOSS garden GNU/Linux google government HP hunting Intel Lenovo LibreOffice Linux market share migration netbook politics renewable energy Samsung security server small cheap computers smart phone software-patents Solo EV tablets that other OS thin client thin clients trolls Trumpism Ubuntu uptake
My MissionMy observations and opinions about IT are based on 40 years of use in science and technology and lately, in education. I like IT that is fast, cost-effective and reliable. I do not care whether my solution is the same as yours. I like to think for myself.
My first use of GNU/Linux in 2001 was so remarkably better than what I had been using, I feel it is important work to share GNU/Linux with the world. I have been blessed by working in schools where students and school systems have benefited by good, modular software easily installed in most systems.
I have shown GNU/Linux to thousands of students and hundreds of teachers over the years and will continue in some way doing that until I die in spite of the opposition.