Northeast Linux Fest – Advocating Free Software

One of the organizers of the Northeast Linux Fest (March 16 & 17 2013 Harvard University) is blind and the advantages of FLOSS to a blind person convinced him to switch.
Jonathan Nadeau:
“Once I started using a free screen reader with a free operating system, I had freedom in my own computing, and realized the importance of free software for accessibility — it is important for people who depend on accessible software to understand the freedoms that come with using free software, and no longer be stuck in a world of relying on nonfree accessibility software.
So I’m now an advocate of promoting the use of free software in accessibility and want to help educate other people who depend on assistive technology and explain to them the freedoms they deserve.”

About us | Northeast Linux Fest.

This is yet another place FLOSS shines. It’s the right way to do IT of all kinds. I recommend Debian GNU/Linux. Debian has a summary of FLOSS assistive technology.

I have used some of this in a classroom with a nearly blind student. It changed his life. He loved computers and had been frustrated by the difficulty of using them. His attendance and attitude in school improved greatly.

- Robert Pogson

4 Responses to “Northeast Linux Fest – Advocating Free Software”


  1. 1 ssorbom Nov 6th, 2012 at 12:30 am

    I don’t know about the utilities for blind people, but GNU\Linux systems cannot rival their Windows Counterparts in terms of speech recognition (sadly). I used to use Dragon Naturally Speaking to get my essay work done at school. I have Cerebral Palsy, which among other things hampers my fine motor skills (which in turn means very slow typing). It was a godsend in terms of my schooling to be able to dictate my essays in a full 1/4 of the time it otherwise took.
    Unfortunately, Continuous speech recognition algorithms are complicated and existing Dragon software relies heavily on the Windows Speech API to work…
    There is hope on the Horizon though:
    http://simon-listens.org/index.php?id=122&L=1

    And, if the GPL option doesn’t work out there is the possibility that Dragon will one day be ported:
    http://www.speechcomputing.com/node/4171

    Meanwhile, I slog along at less than 20 words/min (and yes, I did type this by hand).

  2. 2 oiaohm Nov 6th, 2012 at 1:09 am

    To be correct there are a few more than you listed.

    http://thenerdshow.com/platypus.html This is basic allows you to use most of the Windows speech recognition software in Linux including Dragon Naturally Speaking. So there is no need to wait for Dragon Naturally Speaking to be ported you could use Dragon Naturally Speaking on Linux today by this wrapper with it running in wine contained.

    You have https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SpeechControl as well. It uses CMU Sphinx speech engine.

    Simon you refer to is the Julius engine.

    So basically you have 2 native Continuous speech recognition algorithms that are open source on Linux being CMU Sphinx and Julius and the means to use the Windows Continuous speech as well and a few other Linux supporting commercials.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speech_recognition_in_Linux

    So in this regard Linux is not as bad off as people attempt to make out.

    ssorbom I really don’t get the on the Horizon point thinking it worked very well for the past 6 years.

    Linux does rival its windows counter part when it comes to speech recognition due to the fact Linux can use the best engine from windows and 2 of its own. CMU Sphinx is very hard to beat at times.

    ssorbom your problem is the out the box experience. Out the box Linux suxs and a lot don’t know that speachcontrol exists or how to set it up.

    I have seen a blind review of Linux. Yes a review done by a true blind person. The command line they quite like. Graphical not so much. In fact the blind prefer Linux to Windows due to how much you can do with simple text. Text to speech from a text output is simple.

  3. 3 ssorbom Nov 6th, 2012 at 1:23 am

    Simon (my first link) uses julius as a backend. Platypus is output only (no formatting or interface commands), I don’t know much about Sphinx. I would give it a go if I could set it up (might try someday).
    Ubuntu has been planning integration for years, I wish them luck.

  4. 4 ssorbom Nov 6th, 2012 at 3:38 pm

    Correction: By formatting I mean the ability fix incorrect output by voice when Dragon hiccups.

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>




Archives by Month

My Mission

My observations and opinions about IT are based on 40 years of use in science and technology and lately, in education. I like IT that is fast, cost-effective and reliable. I do not care whether my solution is the same as yours. I like to think for myself.

My first use of GNU/Linux in 2001 was so remarkably better than what I had been using, I feel it is important work to share GNU/Linux with the world. I have been blessed by working in schools where students and school systems have benefited by good, modular software easily installed in most systems.

I have shown GNU/Linux to thousands of students and hundreds of teachers over the years and will continue in some way doing that until I die in spite of the opposition.

Posts

November 2012
S M T W T F S
« Oct   Dec »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

    Writing

    3426 articles
    30509 comments

      Comments

      platforms
      linux 17415
      windows 12733
      macos 206
      sun 3
      wp 2

      browsers
      firefox 23849 
      safari 11835 
      chrome 11687 
      ie 4615 
      iceweasel 4239 
      opera 1641 
      konqueror 198 
      netnewswire 14 
      epiphany 2 
      flock 0 
      bonecho 0 
      lynx 0 

Bad Behavior has blocked 3839 access attempts in the last 7 days.