<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AMD ARMed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mrpogson.com/2012/10/30/amd-armed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mrpogson.com/2012/10/30/amd-armed/</link>
	<description>One man. Closing, all the windows.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 16:09:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: oiaohm</title>
		<link>http://mrpogson.com/2012/10/30/amd-armed/#comment-101218</link>
		<dc:creator>oiaohm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 22:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrpogson.com/?p=15398#comment-101218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Really I would love if AMD would do a Huge Big Little chip.  A true full split personalities chip.

Huge-Big-Little chip refering to a chip that is X86 cores + Arm big cores + Arm Little cores in one dia.
http://www.zdnet.com/why-your-next-arm-chip-might-have-multiple-personalities-7000006575/

Linux has moved past the Idea of all cpus in a computer being the same.

Intel has produced arm chips for years.  Problem here is Intel does not want the fall of the x86 since this would open up the field.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really I would love if AMD would do a Huge Big Little chip.  A true full split personalities chip.</p>
<p>Huge-Big-Little chip refering to a chip that is X86 cores + Arm big cores + Arm Little cores in one dia.<br />
<a href="http://www.zdnet.com/why-your-next-arm-chip-might-have-multiple-personalities-7000006575/" rel="nofollow">http://www.zdnet.com/why-your-next-arm-chip-might-have-multiple-personalities-7000006575/</a></p>
<p>Linux has moved past the Idea of all cpus in a computer being the same.</p>
<p>Intel has produced arm chips for years.  Problem here is Intel does not want the fall of the x86 since this would open up the field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: harry</title>
		<link>http://mrpogson.com/2012/10/30/amd-armed/#comment-101212</link>
		<dc:creator>harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 17:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrpogson.com/?p=15398#comment-101212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I use AMD 64bits and have always been happy with AMD.
Their failure to adapt to new paradigms was puzzling when they missed the netbook,etc&gt; boat but 2014 is their ETA for the ARMed CPU?

Puzzling is when you miss the boat once, stunning incompetence is when you do it twice in a row.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use AMD 64bits and have always been happy with AMD.<br />
Their failure to adapt to new paradigms was puzzling when they missed the netbook,etc&gt; boat but 2014 is their ETA for the ARMed CPU?</p>
<p>Puzzling is when you miss the boat once, stunning incompetence is when you do it twice in a row.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agent_Smith</title>
		<link>http://mrpogson.com/2012/10/30/amd-armed/#comment-101202</link>
		<dc:creator>Agent_Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrpogson.com/?p=15398#comment-101202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, AMD arrived late to the race. But they have expertise (ATI video cards and Fusion SoC x86).
So, they are able to pull this off.
I just hope they hurry up, or else, their efforts will be in vain.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, AMD arrived late to the race. But they have expertise (ATI video cards and Fusion SoC x86).<br />
So, they are able to pull this off.<br />
I just hope they hurry up, or else, their efforts will be in vain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
