Years ago I advocated AMD CPUs as a less-expensive alternative to Intel monopolistic pricing. When they completely ignored the netbook I began to ignore them. Perhaps they noticed because now they have an ARMed CPU on the horizion:
“Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) is to release its first ARM-based chip in 2014.
…
AMD added that it was also considering making ARM-based chips for consumer-targeted computers, but no decision had been made as yet.”
via AMD in chip tie-up with UK's ARM.
This may be too little and too late but it shows that even thick-headed people can see the light. People want less power-consumption and they want cheaper/smaller computers everywhere, not just in smartphones.
I still am incredulous that they think it will take until 2014 to do what a dozen other companies have done years ago, produce an ARMed CPU. ARM has done most of the work. They mostly have to do packaging in which task they have a lot of expertise. Perhaps it will take that long to get servers running ARM in volume but the small cheap computer is here now. I wonder if Intel will get the message.
AMD, WAKE UP!

17463
12767
206
3
2
23908
11859
11711
4638
4261
1641
198
14
2
0
0
0
Well, AMD arrived late to the race. But they have expertise (ATI video cards and Fusion SoC x86).
So, they are able to pull this off.
I just hope they hurry up, or else, their efforts will be in vain.
I use AMD 64bits and have always been happy with AMD.
Their failure to adapt to new paradigms was puzzling when they missed the netbook,etc> boat but 2014 is their ETA for the ARMed CPU?
Puzzling is when you miss the boat once, stunning incompetence is when you do it twice in a row.
Really I would love if AMD would do a Huge Big Little chip. A true full split personalities chip.
Huge-Big-Little chip refering to a chip that is X86 cores + Arm big cores + Arm Little cores in one dia.
http://www.zdnet.com/why-your-next-arm-chip-might-have-multiple-personalities-7000006575/
Linux has moved past the Idea of all cpus in a computer being the same.
Intel has produced arm chips for years. Problem here is Intel does not want the fall of the x86 since this would open up the field.