Today is the day Bill C-19 should pass the House of Commons late this afternoon barring Acts of God or other such calamities. It has been a long time coming but the House is about to free us from the intrusive, expensive and misdirected firearms registry. All that remains is for the Senate to rubber-stamp the process and the Governor General to give royal assent. Those should be easy compared to getting a majority PC party in place.
Once again we see the tragic vulnerabilities M$ has spread over the planet including newbie mistakes in allocating buffers and strings. IE includes vulnerabilities that will allow remote code execution with no user interaction. Just viewing a page will be enough to send your PC to malware Hell.
It’s a good thing IE is declining in usage but this vulnerability could also affect other web-enabled applications. Just being near that other OS makes me feel dirty. Bloated spaghetti code hides everything including vulnerabilities like this in one of the most-tested applications on the planet. Can anyone claim the vulnerability would not have been found earlier or killed early if the application had been FLOSS? I recommend Debian GNU/Linux because opening the code is a good thing for developers and users alike.
SJVN and others have opined on whether or not “8″ will be a hit for M$. Jason Perlow has a different take. He writes that “7″ and legacy apps will be around for a long time and new development will occur on ARM.
That’s probably true in part but I like numbers. There are still tons of people using XP. Are they going to migrate to a dead-end-support-only platform in “7″? Are those who migrated to “7″ going to migrate again to “9″ or “10″ or whatever eventually comes down the pipe? I see people having to finally think about migrating instead of just doing it because that is what has been done for years. The x86 Wintel treadmill may not appeal to many if the apps don’t evolve. Who is going to get on the WARM treadmill if they have options? Wintel started with no/few options and none were able to survive the anti-competitive actions of M$ except GNU/Linux and some *NIX that just refuse to die.
Faced with real viable choices, IT is going to become much more diverse with M$’s stuff being only one of several options. Those who move to ARM to use devices as thin clients/PCs will not require M$ to be on those devices. There are many other viable choices that everyone knows exist on smart thingies of all kinds. 2011 was the Year of Android/Linux on Smart Phones. 2012 will be the year of Android/Linux on tablets, GNU/Linux on thin clients, and GNU/Linux on servers in the cloud. The pie is getting much larger but M$’s share of choices is shrinking rapidly. 80% of an x86 PC universe will soon become 30% of an x86 and ARM PC universe. There is no longer a compelling reason based on applications to stick with M$, because the applications will not be ported to ARM and new development will be for ARM and web servers.
Even “8″ on servers which Perlow sees as having an edge is marginal. There are many other clouds out there that deliver the goods. M$ will just be 1/N of the cloud, not 80%. ARM may be only 12 percent of clients on the web these days but growth is 100% per annum or more while that other OS shrinks by 2% per annum. ARM is running a Hell of a lot more devices than a few percent.
Perlow may be right that “7″ sticks around for a long time but, at the rate it’s share is growing compared to the rate that M$ is losing share, by the time “7″ is old, M$ will be just another player on the field, competing on price and performance, not exclusive deals with everyone. It will only take two or three years for this to be clear. I can wait. It doesn’t seem to me that “8″ has anything going for it and OEMs and retailers who make space for it may be wasting precious resources.
Wikimedia Stats, run by Erik Zachte, seems to be down today (403 error). I hope this means this valuable resource is being upgraded:
Hi Tony, wikistats will migrate to a new server, hopefully in January 2012. I hope this will give enough capacity to process full archives again, instead of only stub dumps. Cheers, Erik Zachte (talk) 13:21, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Thanks, Erik. I look forward to this, if the capacity is there. Tony (talk) 14:22, 25 December 2011 (UTC)”
UPDATE A few hours later and they are back with but only up to 2011-12.