<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Linux 3.3/3.4 Will Be Androidian</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mrpogson.com/2012/02/03/linux-3-33-4-will-be-androidian/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mrpogson.com/2012/02/03/linux-3-33-4-will-be-androidian/</link>
	<description>One man. Closing, all the windows.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 10:50:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: oldman</title>
		<link>http://mrpogson.com/2012/02/03/linux-3-33-4-will-be-androidian/#comment-81460</link>
		<dc:creator>oldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 07:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrpogson.com/?p=10030#comment-81460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;If I knew I wouldn’t be wasting my time repeating myself over and over and over again to you guys. I’d be making money providing the next “big” thing.&quot;

Mr. K. it is obvious that you dont know a lot of things beyond the fact that FOSS on linux works for you personally.  Yet that doesnt stop you from commenting even when you are way out of your depth.

As to &quot;repeating yourself oven and over again&quot;. that is a problem you bring on youself as you butt in to conversations that are not directed at you.

Dont like it, dont post.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If I knew I wouldn’t be wasting my time repeating myself over and over and over again to you guys. I’d be making money providing the next “big” thing.&#8221;</p>
<p>Mr. K. it is obvious that you dont know a lot of things beyond the fact that FOSS on linux works for you personally.  Yet that doesnt stop you from commenting even when you are way out of your depth.</p>
<p>As to &#8220;repeating yourself oven and over again&#8221;. that is a problem you bring on youself as you butt in to conversations that are not directed at you.</p>
<p>Dont like it, dont post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oldman</title>
		<link>http://mrpogson.com/2012/02/03/linux-3-33-4-will-be-androidian/#comment-81458</link>
		<dc:creator>oldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 07:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrpogson.com/?p=10030#comment-81458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I said, “That’s the desktop metaphor. It works well with business. It was designed for business. “THAT’S *NOT* WHAT IS GOING ON WITH THE MOBILE DEVICES.”&quot;

You see Mr. K. you can&#039;t circumvent the implications of what you are saying. It is those implications that I had in mind when this exchange started. The question becomes, what is going on on mobile devices? Do you think that tasks change?

I know you dont like having to answer the ebil troll, but that what you get to do in this subjectjust like I get to listen to you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I said, “That’s the desktop metaphor. It works well with business. It was designed for business. “THAT’S *NOT* WHAT IS GOING ON WITH THE MOBILE DEVICES.”&#8221;</p>
<p>You see Mr. K. you can&#8217;t circumvent the implications of what you are saying. It is those implications that I had in mind when this exchange started. The question becomes, what is going on on mobile devices? Do you think that tasks change?</p>
<p>I know you dont like having to answer the ebil troll, but that what you get to do in this subjectjust like I get to listen to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kozmcrae</title>
		<link>http://mrpogson.com/2012/02/03/linux-3-33-4-will-be-androidian/#comment-81413</link>
		<dc:creator>Kozmcrae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 03:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrpogson.com/?p=10030#comment-81413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I kind of wonder what you think an idealized, smartphone-based business world would base itself upon, though. Twitter perhaps?&quot;

If I knew I wouldn&#039;t be wasting my time repeating myself over and over and over again to you guys.  I&#039;d be making money providing the next &quot;big&quot; thing.

You failed in your search so you provided some words for me.  How generous of you.  Thanks but NO THANKS!  You interpreted my words in the way you wanted them to be.  You have to mangle them to get them the way you wanted them.

I said, &quot;That’s the desktop metaphor. It works well with business. It was designed for business. &quot;THAT&#039;S *NOT* WHAT IS GOING ON WITH THE MOBILE DEVICES.&quot;

How much clearer can that be?  That is not &quot;implying&quot; that people will be doing mundane desktop tasks with their mobile devices now is it @ldman and now Flying Toaster?  NOW IS IT?

You will fail to acknowledge your misstep.  It was a minor one and could have been settled with a simple acknowledgment and that would have been the end of it.  But no, you have to try to beat it to death because you are simply not man enough to accept that you were wrong.  No matter how trivial it may be.  And now Flying Toaster has to get into the act.  Hey, any other Cult of Microsoft members want in on this?  @ldman doesn&#039;t show any sign of slowing down on it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I kind of wonder what you think an idealized, smartphone-based business world would base itself upon, though. Twitter perhaps?&#8221;</p>
<p>If I knew I wouldn&#8217;t be wasting my time repeating myself over and over and over again to you guys.  I&#8217;d be making money providing the next &#8220;big&#8221; thing.</p>
<p>You failed in your search so you provided some words for me.  How generous of you.  Thanks but NO THANKS!  You interpreted my words in the way you wanted them to be.  You have to mangle them to get them the way you wanted them.</p>
<p>I said, &#8220;That’s the desktop metaphor. It works well with business. It was designed for business. &#8220;THAT&#8217;S *NOT* WHAT IS GOING ON WITH THE MOBILE DEVICES.&#8221;</p>
<p>How much clearer can that be?  That is not &#8220;implying&#8221; that people will be doing mundane desktop tasks with their mobile devices now is it @ldman and now Flying Toaster?  NOW IS IT?</p>
<p>You will fail to acknowledge your misstep.  It was a minor one and could have been settled with a simple acknowledgment and that would have been the end of it.  But no, you have to try to beat it to death because you are simply not man enough to accept that you were wrong.  No matter how trivial it may be.  And now Flying Toaster has to get into the act.  Hey, any other Cult of Microsoft members want in on this?  @ldman doesn&#8217;t show any sign of slowing down on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oldman</title>
		<link>http://mrpogson.com/2012/02/03/linux-3-33-4-will-be-androidian/#comment-81257</link>
		<dc:creator>oldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrpogson.com/?p=10030#comment-81257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I kind of wonder what you think an idealized, smartphone-based business world would base itself upon, though. Twitter perhaps?&quot;

The Toasters comment illustrates my point. If indeed the desktop metaphor is being replaced by the mobile device, then the implication is that the same tasks should be performable. Ergo, you did in you own way imply that it would be doable on mobile devices.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I kind of wonder what you think an idealized, smartphone-based business world would base itself upon, though. Twitter perhaps?&#8221;</p>
<p>The Toasters comment illustrates my point. If indeed the desktop metaphor is being replaced by the mobile device, then the implication is that the same tasks should be performable. Ergo, you did in you own way imply that it would be doable on mobile devices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flying Toaster</title>
		<link>http://mrpogson.com/2012/02/03/linux-3-33-4-will-be-androidian/#comment-81193</link>
		<dc:creator>Flying Toaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrpogson.com/?p=10030#comment-81193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;b&gt;No @ldman, I never implied it, not at all, in any universe. If you think I did, then go dig it up. Or shut up.&lt;/b&gt;

No you didn&#039;t. There&#039;s a reason I quoted you on that &quot;disruptive technologies&quot; thing. Here&#039;s the &lt;a href=&quot;http://mrpogson.com/2012/01/27/its-true-more-people-use-smartphones-than-desktopnotebook-pcs/#comment-79317&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;original text&lt;/a&gt;&quot;

&quot;That’s not what is going on with the mobile devices. Just as the PC and the desktop were disruptive technologies so are the mobile devices and the software that goes with them.&quot;

I kind of wonder what you think an idealized, smartphone-based business world would base itself upon, though. Twitter perhaps?

Just imagine a project report going like this:

&quot;@Boss OMG!!! Everything&#039;s going fine. Am I going to get a raise? UGH! LULZ!!! #initech_sux&quot;

That would be a riot, wouldn&#039;t it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>No @ldman, I never implied it, not at all, in any universe. If you think I did, then go dig it up. Or shut up.</b></p>
<p>No you didn&#8217;t. There&#8217;s a reason I quoted you on that &#8220;disruptive technologies&#8221; thing. Here&#8217;s the <a href="http://mrpogson.com/2012/01/27/its-true-more-people-use-smartphones-than-desktopnotebook-pcs/#comment-79317" rel="nofollow">original text</a>&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;That’s not what is going on with the mobile devices. Just as the PC and the desktop were disruptive technologies so are the mobile devices and the software that goes with them.&#8221;</p>
<p>I kind of wonder what you think an idealized, smartphone-based business world would base itself upon, though. Twitter perhaps?</p>
<p>Just imagine a project report going like this:</p>
<p>&#8220;@Boss OMG!!! Everything&#8217;s going fine. Am I going to get a raise? UGH! LULZ!!! #initech_sux&#8221;</p>
<p>That would be a riot, wouldn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kozmcrae</title>
		<link>http://mrpogson.com/2012/02/03/linux-3-33-4-will-be-androidian/#comment-81068</link>
		<dc:creator>Kozmcrae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrpogson.com/?p=10030#comment-81068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ @ldman

&quot;In your dreams Scheißekopf.&quot;

I was giving you an out.  So much for that.  Here&#039;s the original text.

“But you have implied it and thats enough.”

No @ldman, I never implied it, not at all, in any universe. If you think I did, then go dig it up. Or shut up.

So @ldman shuts up. Good for you @ldman.


So show me where I have implied that users of mobile devices will be using &quot;mundane desktop applications&quot;.  You made an accusation.  Withdraw it or prove it if you can.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ @ldman</p>
<p>&#8220;In your dreams Scheißekopf.&#8221;</p>
<p>I was giving you an out.  So much for that.  Here&#8217;s the original text.</p>
<p>“But you have implied it and thats enough.”</p>
<p>No @ldman, I never implied it, not at all, in any universe. If you think I did, then go dig it up. Or shut up.</p>
<p>So @ldman shuts up. Good for you @ldman.</p>
<p>So show me where I have implied that users of mobile devices will be using &#8220;mundane desktop applications&#8221;.  You made an accusation.  Withdraw it or prove it if you can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flying Toaster</title>
		<link>http://mrpogson.com/2012/02/03/linux-3-33-4-will-be-androidian/#comment-80894</link>
		<dc:creator>Flying Toaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 11:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrpogson.com/?p=10030#comment-80894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;b&gt;oldman “anades” I have find a lookup for this one for old english. That seams Spanish. If it is spanish so it is tainted old english I can work it all out. If not you have found a old english word I don’t know.&lt;/b&gt;

In other news, Doc Brown powers time-travelling Delorean with stolen plutonium from Libyan terrorists.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>oldman “anades” I have find a lookup for this one for old english. That seams Spanish. If it is spanish so it is tainted old english I can work it all out. If not you have found a old english word I don’t know.</b></p>
<p>In other news, Doc Brown powers time-travelling Delorean with stolen plutonium from Libyan terrorists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oiaohm</title>
		<link>http://mrpogson.com/2012/02/03/linux-3-33-4-will-be-androidian/#comment-80887</link>
		<dc:creator>oiaohm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 11:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrpogson.com/?p=10030#comment-80887</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[oldman &quot;anades&quot; I have find a lookup for this one for old english.  That seams Spanish.   If it is spanish so it is tainted old english I can work it all out.  If not you have found a old english word I don&#039;t know.

From all I have seen in old english there are no ana or [ae]na words. From memory it was something about the phonetics.  Of course there is always a chance I have never had to use that word.

Farley sure I am getting the meaning without that word.  Does match our stubbornness.

ἀκρίβωμα and ἀδαημονίη both by char set look greek.  Greek and Spanish are not languages I am anywhere near skilled with.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oldman &#8220;anades&#8221; I have find a lookup for this one for old english.  That seams Spanish.   If it is spanish so it is tainted old english I can work it all out.  If not you have found a old english word I don&#8217;t know.</p>
<p>From all I have seen in old english there are no ana or [ae]na words. From memory it was something about the phonetics.  Of course there is always a chance I have never had to use that word.</p>
<p>Farley sure I am getting the meaning without that word.  Does match our stubbornness.</p>
<p>ἀκρίβωμα and ἀδαημονίη both by char set look greek.  Greek and Spanish are not languages I am anywhere near skilled with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flying Toaster</title>
		<link>http://mrpogson.com/2012/02/03/linux-3-33-4-will-be-androidian/#comment-80871</link>
		<dc:creator>Flying Toaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrpogson.com/?p=10030#comment-80871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Correction:

I am -&gt; I have]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction:</p>
<p>I am -&gt; I have</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oldman</title>
		<link>http://mrpogson.com/2012/02/03/linux-3-33-4-will-be-androidian/#comment-80865</link>
		<dc:creator>oldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrpogson.com/?p=10030#comment-80865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Following my family tree required documents requires reading old english. Large sections of it were written in it and by tradition new sections are also written in old english.&quot;

ROFLMAO. Yet one more example of your ἀκρίβωμα ... or is that ἀδαημονίη. Of course the joy of nyms is that you cant prove that you aren&#039;t just making that story up and are just a very good and fast lookup.

At any rate, I leave you with one more translation effort. You may find it amusing and relevant to us both.

þu stunge álærest þæs bearges forgrindet, ic anades ándaga ond tmendes þæs bearges]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Following my family tree required documents requires reading old english. Large sections of it were written in it and by tradition new sections are also written in old english.&#8221;</p>
<p>ROFLMAO. Yet one more example of your ἀκρίβωμα &#8230; or is that ἀδαημονίη. Of course the joy of nyms is that you cant prove that you aren&#8217;t just making that story up and are just a very good and fast lookup.</p>
<p>At any rate, I leave you with one more translation effort. You may find it amusing and relevant to us both.</p>
<p>þu stunge álærest þæs bearges forgrindet, ic anades ándaga ond tmendes þæs bearges</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
